Canadians are not free to read about important scientific findings

Today is the beginning of Freedom to Read Week,  “an annual event that encourages Canadians to think about and reaffirm their commitment to intellectual freedom, which is guaranteed them under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.”

To many Canadians, censorship and the suppression of ideas is something that mostly happens in other countries. But recently, scientists, journalists, and science writers in Canada have been sounding the alarm over systematic policies by the Canadian federal government to restrict the communication of scientific findings and thinking to the general public.

To draw attention to the crisis, the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) recently held a panel discussion called Unmuzzling Government Scientists: How to Re-Open the Discourse at its annual meeting in Vancouver on February 17. (Despite its name, the AAAS is an international organization dedicated to advancing science around the world.)

The entire panel discussion can be viewed here, and it is chilling. In the video, scientists and journalists discuss how governments have succumbed to pressure from corporate interests to suppress the dissemination of scientific results. Margaret Munro, a journalist with Postmedia News, relates how journalists and science writers used to have an open relationship with scientists working for Canadian federal agencies. This changed very quickly after November 2007, when Environment Canada put in place a set of policies to ensure that “just as we have one department, one website, we should have one department, one voice.” It was clear that this voice should be dictated from the top. Scientists working for Environment Canada are now disallowed from participating in any interviews that have not been cleared by media relations staff. The great majority of requests for interviews by journalists are not granted—instead, journalists get an email containing a pre-approved response or statement. When interviews are granted, a media officer must be present, and the interview is recorded, hardly a situation that encourages scientists to speak freely. Since Environment Canada has adopted these policies, there has been an 80% decline in the amount of media coverage of issues relating to global warming. And a number of federal agencies since then have adopted similar policies regarding the communications that their scientists are permitted to have with the outside world.

Another member of the panel, Francesca Grifo, spoke on behalf of the Union of Concerned Scientists in the United States. She talked about how Bush-era policies led to similar muzzling of scientists in the U.S., even resulting in abuses where the scientific reports of government scientists were re-written without the scientists’ approval to reflect a position favoured by the government—including reports that directly impacted public health, such as testing children’s products for lead content. With systematic documentation and organized political pressure, the situation in the United States has begun to change. For example, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the U.S. counterpart to Environment Canada, now has in place specific policies that allow scientists to hold interviews without prior approval, and to express their own opinions and interpretations unhindered by the agency.

The Canadian policies are a blight on intellectual freedom, and seriously undermine the rights and abilities of the public to make informed choices, whether about their governance, or even their own health. In 2011, the Canadian Science Writers’ Association published an open letter to the government to draw attention to the issue; this letter went unheeded. On February 16, the CSWA sent another letter to the Prime Minister’s Office. You can read the letter here.

The WGA will be drafting a letter as well, calling for a change in the policies that stifle the communication of scientific ideas to the public. We encourage you to also take an individual stand and send your own letter in support of your freedom to read about important scientific discoveries that affect all Canadians.

About these ads

About julie sedivy

I'm a cognitive scientist and a writer of nonfiction and poetry. I serve as the President of the Writers Guild of Alberta.
This entry was posted in freedom to read and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Canadians are not free to read about important scientific findings

  1. Bob says:

    As a writer, I find this deeply disturbing. Canada brags about being a country of freedoms and yet, if the reports above are to be believed, the Canadian government’s behaviour is no better than that of a 3rd or 4th world dictator. Harper did say he would change Canada and we would not recognize it. If we, as writers, let this go unchallenged we have only ourselves to blame. And it will only get worse.

  2. Pingback: The Harper Government’s Science Communication Stinks, But Is it Censorship? « Pasco Phronesis

  3. janice williamson says:

    I agree entirely about the dangers of this approach to science. What happens when there is authoritarian control over information. It not only harms our understanding of scientific research, it shapes how and whether we come to know about it. The ongoing cuts to scientific research in climate change, cuts to research on Canadian immigration, cuts to the long-form census – all will diminish our understanding of our world in the future. But dumbing down and controlling information allows for greater control and manipulation from above. I hope other writers’ organizations will organize to speak out on this tip-of-the-melting-iceberg issue the science writers are raising…. Perilous times.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s